sulkyblueblog: (Default)
I finally got around to watching the inauguration ceremony tonight, my Sky box in a fit of right-wing ness refused to record it on Tuesday and I had to wait for it to turn up on iplayer.

The BBC production was pretty week I thought, the graphics of the manic blue and red bubbles was really tacky, looked like that thing you do at school to make ugly paper out of water with ink and bubbles. I wasn't particularly impressed by the commentary and reporting teams either, they talked over things and failed to talk over the silent bits. I'm not sure whether it was the iplayer encoding or actually the live feed, but bits were also out of focus and with awful colour balance/exposures too. I had been looking forward to watching the BBC coverage as I thought they'd do a nice job and have some interesting commentary, this felt amateurish.

I found the constant commenting on the fact that Obama is the first black president to be a little annoying. I'm not sure I can put it into words properly. It seems hypocritical somehow to be commenting on the colour of his skin as an indication that the colour of his skin doesn't matter anymore. There is so much more to this man than the fact he is black (like he fact he is actually of mixed race parents), the biggest contrast between the 44th president and the 43rd is not skin colour! He did not win the election because he's black, or despite the fact that he's black... he won it because of a lot of complex elements and making it a one issue campaign does a diservice to all involved. I understand it's an important milestone, but I'm not sure I heard the word 'democrat' a single time during the commentary.

On a less serious note - George Bush Snr looked pretty heavily medicated, Jimmy Carter looked perky and spry on the other hand. Dick Cheney was in a wheelchair apparently because he strained his back packing boxes. Hillary Clinton looked like she'd plastered her smile and Michelle Obama looked like she was wearing curtains.

I was intrigued by the singing of My Country Tis of Thee. It turns out the song has a couple of interesting connections. Martin Luther King Jr referenced it in his I Have A Dream speech. It was also sung by Marian Anderson on the Lincoln Memorial in 1939 after she had been refused permission to sing at a concert in a white school and Eleanor Roosevelt helped arrange a new concert for her, attended by 75,000 people.

John Williams's Air and Simple Gifts (an arrangement of The Lord of the Dance) was beautiful and the musicians looked to be having so much fun... it's a real shame they were miming because it was too cold for the instruments. It felt like a strange piece of music to play, I was expecting something a lot more powerful, loud and boastful, instead it was simple, uplifting and joyful. Also it was so cool to me that Yo-Yo Ma played for President Bartlett on the West Wing too

The swearing in itself was something of a comedy of errors. Honestly it's like 8 lines! Although apparently the presidency changes at noon regardless of whether Obama had said the oath or not!

The inaugural address had a lot to live up to and delivered pretty impressively. I liked that the crowd, or at least those near the microphones had the decency to not boo the thanking of Bush for his service. It was an interesting, gutsy and impressive declaration of intent; not holding back in telling off pretty much everyone. I like the language used to give digs - "we have chosen hope over fear", "As for our common defence, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." I loved the mention that the US is made up not just of different religions - but also non-believers. It was eloquent, it was intelligent, it was inspiring... it was like watching a Bartlett speech. "All this we can do. All this we will do." - God I hope so!

After that, anything would be a bit of a let down , but I could definitely have lived without the poetry... maybe it was actually brilliant and I just didn't get it, maybe it was just badly delivered... but it kinda killed the mood.

The benediction took a while to get going, but was powerful when it did. The ending making everyone laugh and say amen together was perfect.

Sadly after that there was a slightly chaotic playing of Sousa (I think the Liberty Bell?) which seemed to have two bands playing a couple of bars out of synch, maybe it was a PA failure. Then it was back to inane chattering from the BBC 'experts' and the Helicopter of Happiness taking Bush away to a happy retirement dribbling into his golf shirt.
sulkyblueblog: (Default)
What's with the ridiculous number of ' scattered around bbc headlines these days? Some of them are ok, some of them are just silly uses of grammar, some of them actually concern me because they spin the news stories in ways that they aren't intended to be. I understand there's character limits on these things, and snappy headlines are tricky to come by without occasionally distorting/exaggerating issues, but many of these I feel most of these would not be harmed by either removing the ' or rephrasing completely.

The following were all on the front page of bbc news when I wrote this.

Coroner 'to show cockpit video'
- What on earth are the ' for there! Strictly speaking a that is a quote, but shouldn't that use "? It's a headline anyways, for a quote that dull you don't need to indicate it surely
Two hurt in 'mail bomb' explosion
It was a bomb. In the mail. I don't think it needs the ' there.
Paedophiles 'to show web names'
- Pretty meaningless with or without the ', the actual headline is "Plan to list paedophile web names" - much better, more accurate, no ' and only 2 characters longer.
Iran envoy 'abducted in Baghdad'
- Well the story says he HAS been abducted, the ' in the headline make me think the story is about something that's open to interpretation.
'Missing' Miss Brazil found in UK
- I'll allow that one, she wasn't really missing.
Climate change 'affecting' China
- Officials have linked issues in China to climate change. By adding in ' the BBC seems to be suggesting that they don't believe the officials, while the tone of the article makes it clear that there is climate change and it's affecting people.
'Nobody planning' attack on Iran
- This is paraphrasing slightly a quote from Tony Blair - "nobody is talking about or planning military intervention". If I were going to do it that way I'd put the whole thing in '. Given that the story is about the quote, I'd also put Blair's name in there.
'Super-scope' opens for business
- I'll let them have that one
Special needs 'costs spiralling'
- Another paraphrased quote, this time using new words, not just rearranging them. This one looks even more dodgy to me as the watchdog doesn't seem as concerned for the actual cost as they are for the cost-effectiveness and the resulting effect on the children's educations.
Death crash woman 'not guilty'
- According to a court of law she's not guilty, why is that in '? Again it makes me think that the BBC (or someone) is criticising that statement. In actual fact the woman was found guilty of careless driving, but not guilty of causing death by dangerous driving... so the headline is both wrong and irritating.

I'll allow the ' in O'Neill to go through without further comment ;0)

Am I just getting bugged by nothing? I have to say since I noticed the ' attack a week or so ago I can't help finding more of them.

Profile

sulkyblueblog: (Default)
sulkyblueblog

February 2015

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425 262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 18th, 2025 01:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »