sulkyblueblog: (Default)
[personal profile] sulkyblueblog
Every year I intend to read more, and every year I fail. I can't even really claim that I've replaced quantity with quality as looking at the list it is a really quite spectacularly random collection of stuff. I'll make the same resolution again, but this year I'm 'formalising' it in an objective to read 50 pages per day. I'm not sure whether it will be an average, or just a straight pass/fail. It's not a resolution because I firmly expect to fail to meet it, but it's still a worthy aim.

Authors
One of my few successes this year was reading a higher percentage of female authors, 33% up on 27% from last year. The geography of authors however is less good with only English writing authors (65% Brits, 26% American, one from Ireland and one from Canada).
I read considerably more new authors (new to me that is, not necessarily first time authors) than last year (74% vs 50% last year), my favourite of whom was easily Ben Aaronovitch who was also one of only 3 duplicated authors. Returning authors were mostly those who I'm committed to series for (Pratchett, Brust, Atkinson, O'Brian, Fforde) and only Neil Gaiman and Yann Martel were returning authors with no real series.

Genres
Once again, less non-fiction than I'd like, only 18%. Non-fiction takes considerably more time and attention to read and I'm not great at that. I used to try and set aside coffee shop time to read them, but these days that time is eaten up by writing.
Of the fiction, about 50% of it fell into fantasy, science fiction or somewhere in between. I seem to be reading more fantasy these days - plenty of vampires, magic and ghosts on my list, but not a single spaceship! I wonder if it comes down to the attention (and page count) issue again, or the fact that most of my books come from Waterstones' 3-for-2 tables which doesn't feature so much SF.

Years
21% of books were from this year, including plenty that I hadn't even realised were that recent - again mostly thanks to the Waterstones' 3-for-2 (which I'm clearly going to miss terribly). Book of the publishing year for me was actually my favourite book of my overall reading year - Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch.
With 21% of the books I read published this year, 29% from last year and another 32% from the rest of the 2000s, that makes 82% from the latest decade. I usually try to read a bit broader range than that, picking off some of the older classics, but this year I read just 2 from the 90s, and 1 each from 60s, 70s and 80s.

Reviews
I don't tend to rate books, but when I compile these lists I go back over my reviews and pull out the books I hated, the books I adored and whatever is left in the middle. This year 15% I would recommend people not touch with a barge pole.
  • Kraken by China Miéville - messy, overstuffed and smug. I know others that love it, but I found it an utter slog.

  • Solar by Ian McEwan - purportedly a comedy, not in the slightest bit funny or interesting.

  • Doctor Copernicus by John Banville - neither historically accurate nor fictionally enjoyable

  • Money: A Suicide Note by Martin Amis - apparently one of Time Magazine's best 100 English language novels since 1923, utter utter tedious rubbish.

  • Map of a Nation: A Biography of the Ordnance Survey by Rachel Hewitt - painfully slow and dense and weirdly lacking in actual maps.
44% of my reads fall into the not too bad, not too great category. Some of them will have been good books that were somehow flawed, or just middle-of-the-road unremarkable works.
41% of books I decided were rather good, which is way up on the 30% from last year. Am I becoming more positive? What a thought!
  • The Backroom Boys by Francis Spufford - interesting *and* entertaining, the holy grail. If only there were a partner book 'Backroom Girls' that would make it perfect.

  • 97 Things Every Project Manager Should Know by Barbee Davis - a compilation, so some were good, some were bad, but all were interesting one way or the other.

  • Moon Over Soho and Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch - a wonderfully written series which feels like it's written just for me with jokes, attention to detai, likeable but flawed characters and mystery plots that reveal themselves at just the right pace.

  • HMS Surprise by Patrick O'Brian - another solid entry into this series

  • The Help by Kathryn Stockett - I couldn't put this book down, entertaining and moving and also one of my favourite films of the year.

  • Vet on Call by Marc Abraham - a new James Herriot! Hilarious and lovely in equal parts.

  • Dark Matter: A Ghost Story by Michelle Paver - a suitably atmospheric ghost story set in an unusual location, just a bit different to most of what I read.

  • American Gods and Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman - two Gaiman books, each doing a wonderful job of capturing a time and a place and infusing it with magic and mystery.

  • The Hunger Games, Catching Fire and Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins - a brilliant series, right up there with things like Enders Game imho. The first was the best, but the series as a whole is still superb

  • Snuff by Terry Pratchett - Pratchett back on form after a previous disappointment. The intricacy of his writing, the elegance of the jokes and the ideas is phenomenal.

Snuff

Date: 2012-01-09 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaspodog.livejournal.com
Snuff was on my to-read list for 2011, but then I decided that actually I should probably re-read (or read for the first time in some cases) all of the other Discworld novels first.

Currently, I've got as far as The Truth, so I should get to it soon!
Edited Date: 2012-01-09 04:57 pm (UTC)

Re: Snuff

Date: 2012-01-10 07:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sulkyblue.livejournal.com
I'm impressed at the commitment to re-read all the Discworld, that would pretty much comprise my entire reading list for a year, and I don't think my mind would be in a very good state by the end of it.

I've read them all through in order, starting when I came to college and had them forced upon me by an enthusiastic icsf librarian, but have only re-read a couple of the early ones. How do the older ones stand up?

Re: Snuff

Date: 2012-01-10 09:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaspodog.livejournal.com
Pratchett is still finding his style in the first two, and whilst there are flashes of the brilliance to come, they're a bit more generic fantasy-y. The ratio of laughs per page just isn't very high yet. Equal Rites and Mort are also not fantastic books, but they're both saved by their introduction of two very strong characters (Granny Weatherwax and Death, respectively). I'm still not sure about Sourcery - it's OK. I think Wyrd Sisters is when he really hits his stride, and after that the standard remains pretty high.

Which isn't surprising given that 50% of the books between 6 and 26 (where I am now) are about either the Ankh-Morpork City Watch or the witches. Any story about Granny Weatherwax or Captain/Commander Vimes is liable to be a winner as far as I'm concerned!

Equal Rites, Reaper Man and The Fifth Elephant were ones I hadn't read before, and I'm looking forward to getting to another patch of new ones in a few books time, even if some of them are his 'young adult' books. I wasn't too enthused by Reaper Man, but The Fifth Elephant was excellent, and not what I was expecting. I had no idea it was about Überwald at all!

Anyway, 25 down, 14 to go. Going to be in Canada for a couple of weeks soon, so two long flights plus some time hanging about waiting for cub's family to sort themselves out should yield fruitful reading time :)

Date: 2012-01-10 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jkaen.livejournal.com
Just ordered Rivers of London based on your review.

Hunger game series I thought started fairly well in the first book, but dropped off pretty rapidly, I only read the last for completeness.

Snuff I read and liked.

Other than that been reading the game of thrones series, which everybody else in the world probably has done already. And the latest Malazan book.

Date: 2012-01-10 07:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sulkyblue.livejournal.com
I'm scared now that you'll hate Rivers of London and blame me horribly ;0) Although Michael liked the series too, so I'm not too worried.

You're right about Hunger Games, they did get weaker. I think there was something about the scale of it, as the plot got bigger and moved away from just focussing on the closed environment of the games it actually lost my interest a bit.

I haven't read Game of Thrones. I did really enjoy the TV series, but have thus far not been lured into the giant fantasy tomes. I've not come across Malazan, but now I've looked it up it looks interesting. I also like the fact that it might be pretty epic, but seems to have a 'final book' ;0)

Date: 2012-01-10 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gaspodog.livejournal.com
I read the Song of Ice and Fire books after finishing the TV series, and I have to say that whilst they start very strong, they get a bit lost as time goes on and Martin swamps the story with excess characters and inter-linked plotlines.

All in all, the TV show was an excellent adaptation of book 1, and if they maintain this standard in later series you're probably safe enough ignoring the books. Hell, if they cut down the later ones to make them fit in a TV format, they might actually improve them!

Assuming it doesn't get canceled that is.

Profile

sulkyblueblog: (Default)
sulkyblueblog

February 2015

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425 262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 18th, 2025 04:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »